Clinical Outcomes of Complete AC Joint Dislocations Treated Using the Double  Endobutton Method in a Tertiary Care Centre

S, Sandeep; Arathi, Anu

doi:10.65188/nurexus.1026

Page 28

Journal of MedVerse Research & Practice

ISSN: 3107-4278

Clinical Outcomes of Complete AC Joint Dislocations Treated Using the

Double Endo button Method in a Tertiary Care Centre

Dr. Sandeep S

1

, Dr. Anu Arathi

2

Postgraduate, Professor

Department of Orthopedics, Narayana Medical College and Hospital, Nellore, Andhra Pradesh.

Email: sandeepshetty@gmail.com

Submission Date: 26.05.2025

Accepted Date: 23.06.2025

Published Date: 30.06.2025

DOI: 10.65188/nurexus.1026

article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits

unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.

Abstract

Background: Acromioclavicular (AC) joint dislocations, especially those classified as Rockwood types III to VI,

often require surgical intervention to restore joint stability and function. The double Endobutton technique has

emerged as a promising method offering strong fixation with minimal complications.

Methods: A prospective study was conducted at the Department of Orthopedics, Narayana Medical College and

Hospital, Nellore, over one year, involving 50 patients aged 18–60 years with radiologically confirmed Rockwood

type III–VI AC joint dislocations. All patients underwent open reduction and internal fixation using the double Endo

button technique. Functional outcomes were assessed using the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH)

score and Constant-Murley score at 6, 12, and 24 weeks. Radiological assessments and complication rates were also

recorded. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 17.

Results: The mean DASH score improved from 72.4 preoperatively to 13.3 at 24 weeks, while the Constant score

improved from 32.5 to 83.9 in the same period. Radiological stability was maintained in 98% of patients.

Complications were minimal, with only one hardware failure (2%) and two cases of surgical site infection (4%).

Conclusion: The double Endo button technique is a reliable and effective method for managing complete AC joint

dislocations, providing excellent functional recovery, stable anatomical reduction, and a low rate of complications.

Its minimally invasive approach and biomechanical stability make it a preferred alternative to conventional fixation

methods.

Keywords: Acromioclavicular joint dislocation, Double Endo button technique, Shoulder injury, Functional

outcome, DASH score

Introduction

Acromioclavicular (AC) joint dislocations are commonly encountered shoulder injuries, particularly

among young, active individuals and athletes, accounting for approximately 9% of all shoulder girdle

injuries [1]. These injuries typically result from direct trauma to the lateral aspect of the shoulder, often

occurring during contact sports or road traffic accidents [2]. The severity of AC joint dislocations is

categorized by the Rockwood classification system, ranging from Type I to Type VI, with Type III and

above generally considered for surgical intervention due to significant ligamentous disruption and

instability [3].The primary goals in managing high-grade AC joint dislocations (Type III–VI) are to restore

joint stability, relieve pain, and enable early functional recovery. Over the years, multiple surgical

techniques have been developed, including hook plate fixation, Weaver-Dunn procedure, and

coracoclavicular screw fixation. However, these methods are often associated with complications such as

implant failure, infection, and the need for secondary surgery for implant removal [4].

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Page 29

Recently, the Double Endobutton technique has gained attention as a minimally invasive, anatomic

reconstruction method that offers the advantages of preserving normal joint biomechanics and allowing

early mobilization. This technique utilizes a suture-button system to recreate the coracoclavicular ligament

complex, offering superior biomechanical stability and favorable clinical outcomes with fewer

complications compared to traditional methods [5,6]. Despite its increasing use, limited data are available

on the clinical outcomes of the Double Endobutton technique in diverse clinical settings. Hence, this study

was conducted to evaluate the functional and clinical outcomes of complete AC joint dislocations treated

with the Double Endobutton method in a tertiary care center.

Materials & Methods

Study Design

A prospective, hospital-based study was conducted to evaluate the functional and radiological outcomes of

surgical management of acute acromioclavicular joint dislocations using the Double Endobutton technique.

Study Setting and Duration

The study was conducted in the Department of Orthopaedics, Narayana Medical College and Hospital,

Chinthareddypalem, Nellore, Andhra Pradesh, over a period of one year following approval from the

Institutional Ethics Committee.

Study Population and Sample Size

The study included 50 patients aged 18–60 years with radiologically confirmed complete acromioclavicular

joint dislocations classified as Rockwood types III–VI.

Inclusion Criteria

Patients aged 18–60 years with radiologically confirmed Rockwood grade III, IV, V, or VI

acromioclavicular joint dislocation who were medically fit for surgery and willing to provide written

informed consent were included.

Exclusion Criteria

Patients medically unfit for surgery, those with open fractures, polytrauma, hemodynamic instability,

chronic dislocations, presentation more than three weeks after injury, or unwillingness to provide informed

consent were excluded.

Data Collection Procedure

All patients underwent detailed clinical examination and radiological assessment using plain radiographs

and MRI when required. Baseline functional status was assessed using the Disabilities of the Arm,

Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score and Constant-Murley score. Demographic and clinical variables,

including age, sex, side of injury, and time to surgery, were recorded.

Surgical Procedure and Postoperative Management

All patients underwent open reduction and internal fixation using the Double Endobutton technique with

FiberWire under general anesthesia. Postoperatively, the affected limb was immobilized in an arm sling for

a short period, followed by a structured rehabilitation program under physiotherapist supervision.

Follow-up and Outcome Assessment

Patients were evaluated at 6, 12, and 24 weeks after surgery. The primary outcome measures were DASH

and Constant-Murley scores. Secondary outcomes included radiological joint alignment, implant stability,

and postoperative complications. Standard shoulder radiographs were obtained during follow-up to assess

maintenance of reduction and implant position.

Statistical Analysis

Data were compiled using Microsoft Excel and analyzed using IBM SPSS version 17.0. Continuous

variables were expressed as mean ± standard deviation. Changes in functional scores between follow-up

time points were analyzed using paired t-tests. A p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Ethical Considerations

The study was initiated after obtaining approval from the Institutional Ethics Committee. Written informed

Page 30

consent was obtained from all participants after explaining the nature, risks, benefits, and expected

outcomes of the surgical procedure.

Results

Table 1: Demographic Profile of Study Participants (n = 50)

Variable

Category

Frequency

Percentage (%)

Age Group (years)

18–30

17

34%

31–45

22

44%

46–60

11

22%

Gender

Male

38

76%

Female

12

24%

Side of Injury

Right

29

58%

Left

21

42%

The majority of patients were male (76%) and within the age group of 31–45 years (44%), indicating that

middle-aged working males are more prone to AC joint dislocation, likely due to active occupational or

recreational activities. The right side was more commonly affected.

Figure 1: Distribution of Rockwood Classification of AC Joint Dislocation

The majority of patients presented with Grade IV dislocations (36%), followed by Grade III (28%). Grade

VI injuries were relatively rare, comprising 12%, which aligns with the natural incidence of increasing

severity being less common.

Table 2: Mode of Injury

Cause of Injury

Frequency

Percentage (%)

Fall from height

21

42%

Road traffic accident

17

34%

Sports injury

9

18%

Others

3

6%

Page 31

Falls and road traffic accidents were the primary causes of injury. Falls (42%) were slightly more common,

indicating the need for fall prevention programs, especially in occupational settings.

Table 3: Functional Outcome Based on DASH Score Over Time

Time Point

Mean DASH Score ± SD

Range

Preoperative

72.4 ± 5.6

65–85

6 Weeks

38.1 ± 4.9

30–47

12 Weeks

21.5 ± 3.8

16–30

24 Weeks

13.3 ± 2.6

10–18

The DASH score showed a consistent and statistically significant improvement from the preoperative

period to 24 weeks. This reflects a steady recovery in the arm, shoulder, and hand function following the

double Endobutton repair.

Table 4: Functional Outcome Based on Constant Score Over Time

Time Point

Mean Constant Score ± SD

Range

Preoperative

32.5 ± 5.2

25–42

6 Weeks

56.2 ± 6.1

45–65

12 Weeks

71.8 ± 5.3

62–82

24 Weeks

83.9 ± 4.6

76–92

Constant scores increased progressively over time, suggesting improved strength, range of motion, and pain

control. By 24 weeks, most patients reached near-normal shoulder function, validating the efficacy of the

technique.

Table 5: Postoperative Complications and Radiological Stability

Parameter

Frequency

Percentage (%)

Radiological reduction maintained

49

98%

Hardware failure

1

2%

Surgical site infection

2

4%

Persistent shoulder pain

2

4%

No complications

45

90%

Radiological stability was maintained in 98% of the patients, indicating successful anatomical restoration.

Only 1 patient had hardware failure, and 2 developed infections. The overall complication rate was low

(10%), reinforcing the safety and efficacy of the technique.

Discussion

Acromioclavicular (AC) joint dislocations, particularly Rockwood types III to VI, remain a significant

challenge in orthopedic practice due to the risk of chronic pain, functional limitation, instability, and

cosmetic deformity if inadequately managed [1–3]. The primary objective of surgical treatment is to restore

both anatomical alignment and biomechanical stability, thereby enabling early functional recovery. Among

the available operative techniques, the double EndoButton construct has gained widespread acceptance

because of its minimally invasive nature and strong coracoclavicular fixation properties [6,9,10].

In the present study involving 50 patients with complete AC joint dislocations, surgical repair using the

double EndoButton technique resulted in excellent functional and radiological outcomes. There was a

marked improvement in functional scores, with the mean DASH score decreasing from 72.4 preoperatively

to 13.3 at 24 weeks and the Constant score improving from 32.5 to 83.9 over the same period. These results

Page 32

are comparable to those reported by Singh et al., who demonstrated significant improvements in DASH and

Constant scores following double EndoButton fixation in Rockwood type III and V dislocations [14].

Similarly, Li et al. reported favorable early functional recovery with TiRobot-assisted closed-loop double

EndoButton fixation, highlighting improved surgical precision and reduced operative time [7].

Our functional outcomes are also consistent with the findings of Struhl and Liu et al., both of whom

reported superior clinical results with double EndoButton fixation compared to conventional hook plate

techniques [9,10]. The biomechanical advantages of the EndoButton construct include stable

coracoclavicular fixation and reduced implant-related discomfort. Struhl and Wolfson demonstrated

through biomechanical analysis that double EndoButton fixation closely replicates the strength of the native

coracoclavicular ligament complex, thereby minimizing postoperative displacement [5]. In contrast,

traditional hook plate fixation has been associated with complications such as subacromial impingement,

acromial erosion, and the need for routine implant removal [4,13].

Minimally invasive adaptations of the double EndoButton technique have further enhanced clinical

outcomes. El-Sayed and Seleem reported successful reconstruction of the coracoclavicular ligaments using

a minimally invasive double EndoButton approach, achieving excellent stability while reducing soft tissue

disruption and postoperative pain [11]. These findings support the preference for arthroscopically assisted

or percutaneous techniques in managing acute AC joint dislocations.

Radiologically, the present study achieved a 98% success rate in maintaining anatomical reduction at 24

weeks, with only one case (2%) of loss of fixation. This high rate of maintained reduction is comparable to

the outcomes reported by Milewski et al., who observed durable anatomical restoration and high patient

satisfaction at a minimum of five-year follow-up using dual EndoButton devices [12]. The sustained

radiological stability observed in both studies underscores the mechanical reliability of the double

EndoButton construct.

Postoperative complications in our study were minimal, with 4% superficial infection and 2% hardware

failure, none of which required major revision surgery. These findings are in agreement with Kim et al.,

who reported a low complication rate with percutaneous EndoButton fixation in acute AC joint dislocations

[8]. In contrast, Choi et al. documented significantly higher rates of implant irritation, acromial erosion, and

secondary surgery in patients treated with hook plate fixation [4]. A recent systematic review and meta-

analysis by Xue et al. further confirmed that double-button techniques are associated with fewer

complications and better functional outcomes compared to hook plate fixation [13].

The demographic pattern observed in our cohort, with 76% male predominance, reflects the established

epidemiology of AC joint injuries, which are more common in males due to higher participation in contact

sports and manual labor [1,2,12]. Mazzocca et al. and Beitzel et al. have emphasized that anatomical

reconstructions, such as the double EndoButton and two-button techniques, provide superior functional and

cosmetic outcomes compared to older methods like transacromial Kirschner wires and the Weaver-Dunn

procedure [1,2,6]. Huang et al. also demonstrated better clinical outcomes with double EndoButton fixation

compared to single-button techniques, highlighting the importance of restoring both the conoid and

trapezoid components of the coracoclavicular ligament complex [15]. Overall, the present study reinforces

the growing body of evidence supporting the double EndoButton technique as a reliable, biomechanically

stable, and minimally invasive option for the management of complete AC joint dislocations. It provides

excellent functional recovery, high radiological stability, and a low complication rate when compared with

conventional fixation methods [1,6,9,14]. However, larger prospective studies with longer follow-up are

required to further validate these findings and to assess the long-term durability and potential late

complications associated with this technique.

Page 33

Conclusion

The present study demonstrates that the double Endobutton technique is a safe, effective, and functionally

rewarding surgical method for the management of complete acromioclavicular (AC) joint dislocations.

Over a 24-week follow-up, patients showed significant improvements in both DASH and Constant scores,

indicating substantial recovery of shoulder function, pain reduction, and range of motion. Radiological

outcomes confirmed stable joint reduction in the vast majority of patients, and the complication rate

remained minimal. Given the favorable clinical outcomes, high patient satisfaction, and early return to

function, the double Endobutton technique can be considered a reliable alternative to traditional fixation

methods such as hook plates or K-wires, especially in young, active individuals. Its minimally invasive

nature, biomechanical stability, and low incidence of hardware-related issues make it a valuable approach

in contemporary orthopedic practice.

Future studies with larger sample sizes and longer follow-up periods are recommended to further validate

these findings and assess long-term outcomes such as degenerative changes or late-onset complications.

Declaration

Conflict of Interest: The authors declare that they have no competing interests or conflicts of interest

related to this work.

Funding: Nil

Reference

1. Mazzocca AD, Arciero RA, Bicos J. Evaluation and treatment of acromioclavicular joint injuries. Am J

Sports Med. 2007;35(2):316–329.

2. Beitzel K, Cote MP, Apostolakos J, et al. Current concepts in the treatment of acromioclavicular joint

dislocations. Arthroscopy. 2013;29(2):387–397.

3. Rockwood CA Jr, Williams GR, Young DC. Disorders of the acromioclavicular joint. In: Rockwood and

Green’s Fractures in Adults. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven; 1996.

4. Choi S, Hwang I, Lee J, et al. Complications of clavicle hook plate fixation for acromioclavicular joint

dislocation. J Orthop Surg Res. 2019;14:132.

5. Struhl S, Wolfson TS, Kummer FJ. Biomechanical evaluation of the modified Weaver-Dunn

acromioclavicular joint reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2010;38(5):984–989.

6. Salzmann GM, Walz L, Buchmann S, et al. Arthroscopically assisted 2-button technique for treatment of

acute acromioclavicular joint dislocations. Arthroscopy. 2008;24(6):675–681.

7. Li M, Zhang J, Xu R, et al. Closed-loop double EndoButton internal fixation assisted by TiRobot in acute

acromioclavicular joint dislocation. Front Surg. 2024;11:1278192. doi:10.3389/fsurg.2024.1278192

8. Kim KC, Rhee KJ, Shin HD, Kim YM. Percutaneous EndoButton fixation in acute acromioclavicular joint

dislocation. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2019;139(7):931–937. doi:10.1007/s00402-019-03172-3

9. Struhl S. Double Endobutton technique for repair of complete acromioclavicular joint dislocations.

Arthroscopy. 2015;31(2):376–383. doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2014.08.020

10. Liu HH, Wang CG, Sun H, Zhang C, Wang J, Ma X. Comparison of short-term clinical outcomes between

hook plate and continuous loop double EndoButton fixation for acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation.

BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019;20(1):566. doi:10.1186/s12891-019-2969-0

11. El-Sayed M, Seleem O. Minimally invasive double EndoButton reconstruction of coracoclavicular ligaments

for acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation. Egypt Orthop J. 2021;56(4):295–301.

doi:10.1097/01.EOX.0000793641.45432.8a

12. Milewski MD, Tompkins M, Giugale JM, Carson EW, Miller MD, Diduch DR. Anatomic coracoclavicular

ligament reconstruction using two EndoButton devices: minimum 5-year follow-up. Arthroscopy.

2021;37(2):555–563. doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2020.08.032

13. Xue C, Lin J, Yu W, Zhang W, Zhang W. Double-button versus hook plate fixation for acute

acromioclavicular joint dislocation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol.

2023;33(6):1463–1472. doi:10.1007/s00590-023-03492-3

Page 34

14. Singh A, Thomas S, Rajan R, et al. Functional outcomes in Rockwood type III and V acromioclavicular joint

dislocations managed with double EndoButton technique: a retrospective study. J Clin Orthop Trauma.

2025;25:102226. doi:10.1016/j.jcot.2025.102226

15. Huang YC, Chen WC, Hsieh YF, Lin KC, Renn JH. Comparison of clinical outcomes between single and

double EndoButton techniques for acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation. J Shoulder Elbow Surg.

2022;31(4):743–750. doi:10.1016/j.jse.2021.10.012